|
Post by Haskalah on Aug 26, 2016 8:52:25 GMT -7
I think part of the goal of Season Two is to emphasize that people shouldn't have to create optimized min/max characters to succeed. To that end there are weak martials and ridiculous things in PoW can be balanced out if necessary.
|
|
Ash
Approvals
This world is only big enough for one loli.
Posts: 277
|
Post by Ash on Aug 26, 2016 11:35:41 GMT -7
The real problem with PoW is the same problem as everything else: Min/maxers. Ban everyone, problem solved.
|
|
|
Post by Haskalah on Aug 26, 2016 13:42:40 GMT -7
We haven't even investigated the min/maxed PoW under the new system, let alone after overpowered things are banned or altered. I've been suggesting that these studies be done and people consider reasonable restrictions on things that are still overpowered (including things that might be found in-session and brought up later).
|
|
xemadus
Leadership Council
Sure
5000
Posts: 798
|
Post by xemadus on Aug 26, 2016 14:40:10 GMT -7
Not to troll, but also to troll mercilessly, but maybe if you guys knew how to build martials, you wouldn't need PoW? Then go ahead and make me your best non pow pure martial builds. I'll trump all of them with 10 minutes of effort and caster classes. It doesn't matter what aspect of pathfinder you go for, the mechanics that paizo makes available to it's martials just doesn't keep pace with the options available to casters.
|
|
Zanos
Leadership Council
No
how did i get here i am not good with computer
Posts: 684
|
Post by Zanos on Aug 26, 2016 15:28:46 GMT -7
wow xem ur so cool and strong pls prtect me
|
|
xemadus
Leadership Council
Sure
5000
Posts: 798
|
Post by xemadus on Aug 26, 2016 17:48:42 GMT -7
and there goes zanos, horribly missing the point.
Regardless, it's looking like Pow is out by this point. While I would have liked to see an option for preventing people from having both initiator levels and caster levels, I suppose that option won't be getting any reasonable amount of discussion.
Fortunately, between PoW being brought in to DG and now there's been a lot of class additions so it shouldn't turn back to full caster city again. and hell, PoW being nixed might even encourage people to try out some of the newer classes.
|
|
Ash
Approvals
This world is only big enough for one loli.
Posts: 277
|
Post by Ash on Aug 26, 2016 17:55:28 GMT -7
I think he's making fun of you because you're implying your knowledge is greater than others.
And banning people from having both initiator levels and casting levels is stupid. If you're going to ban casters taking dips then ban casters taking dips.
|
|
xemadus
Leadership Council
Sure
5000
Posts: 798
|
Post by xemadus on Aug 26, 2016 19:58:19 GMT -7
I'm implying that no amount of knowledge and planning can make a paizo martial better than a caster. The one thing martials have that I haven't been able to replicate with casters is a barbarian's damage at level 1, though that's only because I haven't counted in animal companions or eidolons.
And before I begin my tirade let me correct you on something; I don't want to ban casters from taking dips. I want to prevent player characters from having both spell/extract lists and maneuvers. The power you get from having both far outshines having either one individually, especially when you get blade caster, and to a lesser degree battle templar, in the mix. In fact, now that I think about it, it might have just been best to ban blade caster and call it a day.
With that said, commencing rant.
The point I have been trying to make ever since the beginning is that it's absolutely pointless to say something shouldn't be allowed because it overshadows paizo martials. The wizard is the best grappler at level 1, sacred fist warpriest is a better monk (though to be fair, monk on it's own is on the edge of the caster/martial paradigm) , magus is the best for burst damage, alchemist is the best natural attacker until you can to the stupid crap that druids can pull off with wild shape, and the list goes on.
Paizo martials are already bottom of the line, and yet I keep seeing people say they don't like PoW because it makes paizo martials worthless. You can't be the cause of something being worthless if it's already worthless when you showed up.
By this point, I'm content to just sit back and see what happens when PoW gets axed.
|
|
|
Post by bioa10 on Aug 26, 2016 21:32:48 GMT -7
We haven't even investigated the min/maxed PoW under the new system, let alone after overpowered things are banned or altered. I've been suggesting that these studies be done and people consider reasonable restrictions on things that are still overpowered (including things that might be found in-session and brought up later). I think we should do this. After a month or so of season 2 if it is still a problem then we can bring it up again. I also agree with making it so that classes with spell lists can't take classes with maneuvers.
|
|
Zanos
Leadership Council
No
how did i get here i am not good with computer
Posts: 684
|
Post by Zanos on Aug 26, 2016 22:24:42 GMT -7
I don't think most people want to get rid of PoW because it overshadows paizo martials. I think most people want to get rid of Path of War, because despite all of your optimization experiments, GMs have far more problems with initiators than with spellcasters.
|
|
Abron
GM
Heretic
Lore-Master General
Posts: 250
|
Post by Abron on Aug 26, 2016 23:45:01 GMT -7
just to add to Zanos's point, there are many powerful maneuvers that PoW characters have at there disposal, including plenty of insta-kill abilities, and they are not balanced with the rest of the game. for example; a caster can only cast his 8th lv. spell(s) so many times a day and will most likely have to contend with the balancing mechanic of spell resistance. However, PoW characters can renew their maneuvers unlimited times a day, even while in combat, and none of their abilities are subject to spell resistance or any other balancing mechanic outside of AC, which alone is a pitiful balancing mechanic for maneuvers.
|
|
|
Post by invincabal on Aug 27, 2016 1:31:16 GMT -7
While some maneuvers do have a will or fort save for them to work, most just target AC, and let's not forget substituting skill checks for attack rolls, saving throws, AC. That's also a really powerful factor, getting a high skill check is relatively easy and then substituting that for combat actions allows them to do some stupidly funky stuff. It reminds me to snake style just on everything defensive and offensive...
|
|
|
Post by Haskalah on Aug 27, 2016 8:44:25 GMT -7
just to add to Zanos's point, there are many powerful maneuvers that PoW characters have at there disposal, including plenty of insta-kill abilities, and they are not balanced with the rest of the game. for example; a caster can only cast his 8th lv. spell(s) so many times a day and will most likely have to contend with the balancing mechanic of spell resistance. However, PoW characters can renew their maneuvers unlimited times a day, even while in combat, and none of their abilities are subject to spell resistance or any other balancing mechanic outside of AC, which alone is a pitiful balancing mechanic for maneuvers. Except... Your caster example is invalid. Varian is arguably one of the least equipped 20+'s and I can get SR checks up to around +35 to +37 I believe? Something ridiculous like that. By the time you're talking 8th level spells there are plenty of things to do, and with most combats at high level taking about 4 rounds, having only 6 8th level spells means nothing. Also note the number of martial vs. casters at the highest level. It doesn't really matter anyway, people will vote PoW down and then we'll be back to the point where martials are a bad choice compared to casters and anyone who bothers to sign up will just go for a caster (or half-caster) like Pre-PoW.
|
|
Abron
GM
Heretic
Lore-Master General
Posts: 250
|
Post by Abron on Aug 27, 2016 8:50:06 GMT -7
That's why we should look into an alternative to PoW, my idea that I threw out earlier was the removal of combat feat tax. That may not be the best alternative but I think it may be a start.
Also, as for being able to pass high SR, if a GM needs to they can tweak SR so as to provide some sort of challenge, however, there is no such mechanic that helps balance out PoW maneuvers outside of AC.
|
|
CRC
GM
Posts: 150
|
Post by CRC on Aug 27, 2016 23:27:47 GMT -7
what if we remove pow and allow mythic instead that way everyone gets it?
|
|
Zanos
Leadership Council
No
how did i get here i am not good with computer
Posts: 684
|
Post by Zanos on Aug 28, 2016 1:57:11 GMT -7
what if we remove pow and allow mythic instead that way everyone gets it?
|
|
xemadus
Leadership Council
Sure
5000
Posts: 798
|
Post by xemadus on Aug 28, 2016 2:33:35 GMT -7
The thought of using mythic was so hated that we added lvls 21-30 instead... Honestly not sure which is worse though. The kinds of stupid shit people can pull off with 10 extra class levels has to be worse than what you can do with mythic... Granted, I say that after having worked out some really stupid shit with mythic... but I don't think anything you can do with mythic leads to what Rainen currently is.
|
|
Geckilian
Leadership Council
Empires Mierely require time.
Posts: 1,026
|
Post by Geckilian on Aug 28, 2016 2:43:49 GMT -7
The thing is Xemadus, Rainen is ridiculous compared to anyone, even the other high level characters. Using him as a yardstick doesn't overly work, aside from showing how ridiculous a single build could get. Your characters tend to share that trait above everyone else's so it's more a case of you building characters that happen to be at a comparatively higher level of optimisation.
As such using Rainen as an example for the silly stuff that can happen 'in situation x' is mostly just relevant to you.
|
|
|
Post by sythus on Aug 28, 2016 7:30:22 GMT -7
Not to troll, but also to troll mercilessly, but maybe if you guys knew how to build martials, you wouldn't need PoW? Then go ahead and make me your best non pow pure martial builds. I'll trump all of them with 10 minutes of effort and caster classes. It doesn't matter what aspect of pathfinder you go for, the mechanics that paizo makes available to it's martials just doesn't keep pace with the options available to casters. You'll also 'trump' every character I can build is because I usually build characters for what the game was intended, social interaction focused on using teamwork to overcome the various challenges of gameplay. Also which is why I've been playing more private sessions with dg players, than I have been playing dg sessions. None of my characters can one-shot the session 'boss', bypass every challenge so I can declare my aloof supremecy at number crunching. If I wanted that out of the game I'd just play with myself. I'd rather not waste the time, which can be used actually 'playing with myself.'
|
|
|
Post by gaston on Aug 28, 2016 16:11:47 GMT -7
Sythus you purposely provoked Xem in what should be a discussion, then you complain when he's calling you out on your trolling? Don't say such stupid remarks then. Keep this in the debate whether PoW should stay or go.
|
|
|
Post by sythus on Aug 28, 2016 17:17:56 GMT -7
k, thanks for policing the universe, Gaston. Will do.
My comment in which I joked about trolling, was that PoW is shit. It's utter, and complete unbalanced fucking garbage that power gamers have a hardon for. I was just trying to say it politely with a bit of humor, but if we're going to be dicks, let's do this thang.
|
|
Geckilian
Leadership Council
Empires Mierely require time.
Posts: 1,026
|
Post by Geckilian on Aug 30, 2016 16:35:50 GMT -7
Based on the outcome of this poll, Path of war is now removed. I'll make an announcement post detailing the season 2 changes, with this, shortly.
|
|
|
Post by Derek Coll on Dec 5, 2016 12:44:37 GMT -7
|
|